Jump to content

Talk:Dan Meuser

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments

[edit]

To edit

"Questionable sources Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or lacking meaningful editorial oversight. Such sources include websites and publications expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, or promotional, or which rely heavily on rumor and personal opinion. Questionable sources should be used only as sources of material on themselves, especially in articles about themselves; see below. They are unsuitable for citing contentious claims about third parties."

I would be opened to the original poster stating that the "Erie County Democrats believe that the public believes..." Ianthegreat22 (talk) 02:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck on the speakership!! An America First household! 2600:1016:B137:6E9F:8D0F:DC07:DF2D:2421 (talk) 14:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dan Meuser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congress 2018?

[edit]

How may we properly address his current run for Congress in the new 9th district (logical successor to the 11th)? This is the PA Supreme Court's map and Meuser decided that there was enough of an overlap and support for him to run in the new 9th. Although the district lacks a demographic centre, it works much better than the overturned gerrymander with multiple non-centred districts. Heff01 (talk) 02:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

template message re: balance and citations

[edit]

Hello Wikipedians,

I read through this article today. It does not appear to be unbalanced, as there exists both negative content and positive content about the subject. There are also 20 citations.

There is currently a "flag" (template message) at the top that reads:

This article may be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints. (August 2009) This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. (September 2010)

Because these issues are moot, and the page has evolved in the past 8-9 years, I'll be deleting the template message.

--Sherwoodspeaks (talk) 18:36, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]