This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Damien Mantach is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
@Shoessss: I'd like your opinion on this article. The subject is clearly notable, and I doubt that anything said in this article is untrue; neverthelessm it is sourced so poorly as to fail WP:BLP. Should we TNT it and start over, or go straight to improving it? —Compassionate727(T·C)18:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- Hello Compassionate727, you may find this “Good” news or “Bad” but many individuals find me as an “Inclusionist” unless there is “Extremely” complaining evidence to delete an article here at Wikipedia. With that said, you are right, the piece needs a lot of work and, also you are right, that Mr. Damien Mantach has generated enough secondary coverage to be included here at Wikipedia. At this point, I would let the article stand….Hoping for more talented individuals, other than me, improve the piece and add more reliable, secondary, and cites. Which can be found here [1]…. Hope this helps. ShoesssSTalk22:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you reverted me and then reverted yourself. I'm not sure if you decided you agree or simply want to discuss first. I agree that the subject is notable and warranting of an article. But I'm not sure I'm the person to improve it, which is why I blanked it. Perhaps I should fetch someone from WikiProject Australia? Although I have summer break coming up in a week, I suppose I might have the time to do it myself here soon. —Compassionate727(T·C)22:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello User:Compassionate727 I reverted your deletion of the Damien Mantach page. But rethought and corrected myself and reverted my revert 😊. I felt the you should have this responsibility, In that you have proposed the article for “Deletion” through the WP:AFD process. As such, it should run the gambit of WP:AFD and let outcome be the outcome 😊… Have a great time during Summer Break. ShoesssSTalk23:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]