Talk:Dallata

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

A fact from Dallata appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 October 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Dallata was one of the villages that locals of Fir'im, Mughr al-Khayt and Qabba'a fled to in the first days of May 1948, when they were attacked during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/October.

Wikipedia

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sharon-mistake

Sharon, M. (2004). Corpus Inscriptionum Arabicarum Palaestinae, D-F. Vol. 3. BRILL. ISBN 90-04-13197-3.

Sharon, 2004, pp. 5-6 makes the mistake of quoting "Isac Hilo", that is Isaac Chelo. Scholem found that his alleged work was a forgery by Eliakim Carmoly, published in 1847.

As for Sharon's statement "The inhabitants were originally from the Maghreb and were settled there by Ottoman authorities", Sharon mention no sources, and the sentence make no sence in view of the 1596 tax records, Huldra (talk) 20:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see if I can find any equivalents from other sources. By the way, why did we remove the Cairo Geniza findings, and the ancient graves of Jose the Galilean etc.? Tombah (talk) 07:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As for the Cairo Geniza findings; I think the connections with this place is tenuous, at most. As for Sharon's statement about the graves of Jose the Galilean etc; Sharon seem to rely only on Guerin, and Guerin relies on Carmoly -> a forgery. However, the 1662 Cippi Hebraici mentiones the above, so I have added that, Huldra (talk) 21:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]