Jump to content

Talk:Dal Lake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleDal Lake was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 5, 2010Good article nomineeListed
December 6, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 6, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the shores of Dal Lake in India (pictured) contain Mughal gardens Shalimar Bagh and Nishat Bagh known as "the jewel of Kashmir valley"?
Current status: Delisted good article

lead section is wrong about the misomer thing

[edit]

the page has "(Dal Lake is a misnomer as Dal in Kashmiri means lake)," in the very first line of the lead statement and as a native kashmiri speaker, i find this odd that someone has written this. Who even thought of writing this ? this does not make any sense. Think about it. if the word "dal" means a lake in kashmiri, then is the name of the bigger lake, wular lake in bandipora district as "wular dal"?

This is actually a nickname, kind of like how colgate is casually used for meaning all toothpastes. This is similar. dal in local kashmiri language means that particular lake only. Nothing more. we dont say "wular lake", but only "wular" because its commonly understood what that means. I am removing this sentence and if any person wants to discuss that, please do that in this section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhveinvp (talkcontribs) 07:32, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to the large amount of uncited text throughout the article. Is anyone willing to address this, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 02:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:57, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of uncited text in the article, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 20:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.