Talk:Dakpa Sheri

Tibet High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Buddhism Mid‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pilgrimage

I am afraid the Pilgrimage section is badly wrong. The citation is to a map in Toni Huber's book, which shows multiple pilgrimage routes. Of these, two were the most important, an annual pilgrimate route that was 3-days long, and 12-year pilgrimage route that was a month-long. Please see this source for an excellent summary:

Arpi, Claude (2013), "The Pure Crystal Mountain Pilgrimage of Tsari", 1962: The McMahon Line Saga, Lancer Publishers, ISBN 9781935501404

-- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It should also be noted that the last 12-year pilgrimage happened in 1956 (the same year as the "Big Map of PRC", in which the Kongka Pass was shown as the boundary of Tibet in the west). -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Religious significance

This mountain is an extremely important site for religious purposes, which needs to be covered. Please see Toni Huber's Chapter 4. Perhaps Ms Sarah Welch can help? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single source

Editors of this article have to keep in mind that everything shouldn't be referenced to a single source. DTM (talk) 16:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A scholarly book counts as as many "sources" as the citations it gives. But why are you raising this? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had remembered that there was a template for Template:One source — This section relies largely or entirely on a single source.. The single source of course is Toni Huber's book. I had just had a passing thought that everything can't be taken solely from his book. But then yes, what you wrote A scholarly book counts as as many "sources" as the citations it gives stands true. No issues. DTM (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]