Talk:Dakeoceras

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cephalopods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CephalopodsWikipedia:WikiProject CephalopodsTemplate:WikiProject CephalopodsCephalopods articles

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Too technical

There is so much specialized vocabulary in this article that it is impenetrable to anyone except a specialist. I made some changes in the lead paragraph to illustrate the type of thing that would help--inserting more widely-known words familiar to non-specialists to at least be able to place the article in a suitable context. When I first saw the article, I had no clue as to what type of organisms were being described or the fact that this genus was only known through the fossil record. Most of the terms need either further explanations (e.g. in parentheses) or at the least links to articles that explain them. If this is typical of other articles in the project, my comments would apply to many other articles too. AlbertBickford (talk) 03:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]