Jump to content

Talk:DailyTech

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It seems dailytech is dead, it hasn't been updated in almost half a year... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.126.206.226 (talk) 05:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


  1. Please delete reference 4 Kubicki, Kristopher. "To Name or Not to Name?". It does not exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonyhallmailbox (talkcontribs) 11:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  • Can someone add the information about Dailytech and Microsoft's 360? I saw recent discussion about them and the Xbox 360 RROD and my local news attributes Daily Tech for publishing the real 360 defect rate... right before MS announced the 1 billion dollar fix for it.


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DailyTech. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]