Talk:Dafne (Opitz-Schütz)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Implications of the statement that Schutz's Dafne was the "first German opera"; use of the word "Singspiel"
[edit]There's two things that could be improved, in my opinion, in this article:
First the article quotes a "traditional" view that Dafne was "the first German opera" but does not assign a source to that view and does not explain what that characterization entails: viz. is there an implication, when it is called "the first German opera", that everything was sung, that there were recitatives? But later German operas most often include spoken dialogues and are still called "operas". If, on the other hand, there is no implication, when it is called "the first German opera", that everything was sung then what is different between the traditional view and the more recent one? In other words it would be helpful to readers to explicitly detail what the implication is of that characterization as "first German opera" and how it is different from the more recent claims that it was just a "spoken drama with sung numbers".
Second the article uses in several places the word "Singspiel" but it is not clear if that usage comes from the sources themselves or if it is just an editor's inference. I replaced for the moment those instances with more neutral phrases that more closely match what is indeed backed by what's quoted from sources.
Contact Basemetal here 11:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Title
[edit]I'd suggest renaming this article to Die Dafne, in line with Gagliano's La Dafne. —capmo (talk) 19:42, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oops, now I realize that native speakers of English will probably understand the suggested title as "Die, Dafne!" :p —capmo (talk) 04:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dafne (Opitz-Schütz). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070824120729/http://www.goldsmiths.ac.uk:80/aurifex/issue1/smart.html to http://www.goldsmiths.ac.uk/aurifex/issue1/smart.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 5 December 2016 (UTC)