Jump to content

Talk:Dadra and Nagar Haveli district

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Format like Oklahoma

[edit]

The article on Oklahoma state of United States is a featured article. It has a well laid structure. Following the same pattern will make this article better. Please help me expand this article based on that structure. I am reorganising the article so that it's readability is improved. 11:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AJ.iitm (talk • contribs)

Stub?

[edit]

Is this still a stub? — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • ER • 07:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EDUCATION & Shri Sanjibhai Rupjibhai Memorial Trust.

[edit]

Ours is self financed charitable Trust, which has a mission to promote education towards excellence and education for all by Gradually starting the non-technical, technical. medical and managerial courses in order to create a self dependant and self sufficient society. It is the dream of our Hon’ble Chairman Shri. Mohan S. Delkar (M.P.) U.T. of Dadra and Nagar Haveli to create a world of education where every deserving student can be provided with the opportunity to learn upto her/his will… 


       Shri Sanjibhai Rupjibhai Memorial Trust has already started SSR College of Arts, Commerce & Science, Saily, Silvassa U.T. of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, in the academic year 2006-2007 under the affiliation of University of Pune. This is the only college in India that is outside Maharashtra and still affiliated to University of Pune. Trust plans to start SSR College of Pharmacy and SSR College of Education in this academic year that is 2007-2008. The facilities that the Trust is providing and plans to provide further are one of the best of its kind.......

link title —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Onlinerajesh (talk • contribs) 14:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DNHseal.gif

[edit]

Image:DNHseal.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Dadra and Nagar Haveli Addition

[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Dadra and Nagar Haveli workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Dadra and Nagar Haveli or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag TALK2ME 09:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Minister

[edit]

The article states that Mr. Badlani was made the Prime Minister for a day so that he could act as a Head of State. However, under international law, a Prime Minster is not a Head of State, but a Head of Government. NelsonLB (talk) 02:15, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns about the Freedom movement section

[edit]

While I commend this expansion[1] of history section(it could be split into a sepearte article). I could not help but notice that it overplays the role played by the RSS. The reason for my concern is this article from Prabhakar Sinari (one of the leaders of the movement); in 2003 which says that the role of the RSS in liberating D&NH was "at best, marginal". --Deepak D'Souza 04:25, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Deepak,

I respect your views. I agree with you that the 'Liberation of D & N' itself can be a separate article. But I disagree with you on the role of organizations. I don't think any organisation's role is being overplayed. It covers the role of all players from a neutral source. But since you have quoted an article written by Prabhakar Sinari himself, let us consider the following.

"Desai was against the RSS organisation as well, he took the risk of bringing in the Sangh volunteers and successfully managed to camouflage their identity from Mr. Nagarwala till the liberation of Silvassa."

— page 51, Dadra and Nagar Haveli: past and the present, by P S Lele

It is clear that RSS volunteers were told to hide their identities by leaders like Appasaheb Karmalkar and Jayanti Bhai Desai, so that their identities do not irk the Indian authorities especially DIG of Special Reserve Police, Mr Nagarwalla. But the identities would have become amply clear by the time they captured Silvassa. Consider this

"By this time, Mr. Nagarwala also came to know about the identity of the RSS workers on the scene. He accepted it as a lesser evil."

— page 56, Dadra and Nagar Haveli: past and the present, by P S Lele

I am not sure who all knew explicitly of the identity of the volunteers. Atleast a few in the Azad Gomatak Dal were aware of that. Mr. Mohan Ranade, one of the leaders of Azad Gomantak Dal (the same group to which Mr Prabhakar Sinari belongs), who was part of the Dadra Nagar Haveli liberation and after that faced solitary confinement in Portugal prison for 14 years, has the following to say about this

"Almost all the volunteers brought by Sudhir Phadke, Rajabhau Wakankar and Nana belonged to Rastriya Swayam Sevak Sangh. Their number now rose to one hundred. We were only twenty-five who had gone from Goa. Sudhir Phadke and others could have done the job all by themselves without taking our organization’s name or our help. But, the political exigencies were not permitting them to do so. After having some breakfast we grabbed our weapons and started to march in the direction of Silvassa. There was a feeling of joy in the air."

— page 40, Struggle Unfinished, Mohan Ranade

Clearly, the RSS volunteers had more than a "marginal role" as you claim. Going by Mr Mohan Ranade, whatever has been said in the article actually underplays the role of RSS and not overplays it. So was Mr Prabhakar Sinari unaware of the identities of the RSS volunteers? Was he kept in dark by his own comarades in the Azad Gomantak Dal? Don't know, Can't say.

Secondly, Mr Prabhakar Sinari's basis of argument is Indian Government's affidavit saying no Indian nationals were involved. We must understand that the affidavit was India's official line. Officially Indian authorities would also deny that DIG of SRP Nagarwalla had any role to play in the liberation. Mr Sinari, in his enthusiasm, himself contradicts this when he says that few volunteers of the RSS were with them. One of propositions can be true; RSS volunteers from Pune were not there at all or few of them were there - Both can't be true at the same time.

With due respects to Mr Prabhakar Sinari, and acknowledging his role too, his blanket 'I did it all' statement, where he does not even mention the role of other allies like the NMO, leave alone the RSS, does not hold much water. Especially when he is contradicted substantially by his own comrades and also by himself. I think we should go by neutral sources.

We can divide the page as you have suggested and expand them both further with more sources. ---nihar (talk) 05:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Independent country

[edit]

Was independence recognized by Portugal or any other country in 1954? Goustien (talk) 20:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not by Portugal until 1975. I doubt it was recognised as a country by any other, not come across any sources so far. But India did not annex it till it invaded the other Portuguese colonies in 1961. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 09:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

change the map

[edit]

Please change the map of India depicted in this article. The map depicts Jammu & Kashmir and Arunachal Pradesh as not parts of India. This is an insult to the whole Indians. Unless you change it, Wikipedia may face a ban in the country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.64.195 (talk) 10:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Liberation

[edit]

I didn't edit the article because there needs to be discussion before this change, but in an encyclopedia there needs to be neutrality, controversial words like "liberation" (normaly used from Indian point of view) or "invasion" (normaly used from Portuguese point of view) should be mellowed into non-emotional terms for an unadulterated encyclopedic experience. This also seems to be the case in Goa, Daman and Diu articles, so it is a larger issue. What do others here think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FernãoMendesPinto (talk • contribs) 23:30, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Dadra and Nagar Haveli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:56, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Dadra and Nagar Haveli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:34, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

owfarfr.daman?

[edit]

213.49.133.183 (talk) 13:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

The article Portuguese links with Dadrá e Nagar-Aveli should be merged into this article. Mathglot (talk) 07:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Same topics. Can have seperate History article if needed.--Nizil (talk) 05:32, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  checkY Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 19:55, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dadra and Nagar Haveli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dadra and Nagar Haveli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dadra and Nagar Haveli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://latestjobs.co.in/dadra-nagar-haveli-education-department-recruitment/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sam Sailor 10:41, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page should be for the Former UT not District

[edit]

This page should be made as a page for the Former union territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and another page should be created for the new Deadra and Nagar Haveli district. Karnatakapolatics (talk) 03:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree strongly for several reasons - 1, At present there is both a union territory and a district known as Dadra and Nagar Haveli which are coterminous. The changes will abolish the union territory but will not affect the existing district. 2, The geography, culture, demographics, education etc sections of the article are not affected by the abolition of the union territory as they also describe the coterminous district. 3, The page describes the history of the area which predates the creation of the union territory. 4, The only changes needed to the article are to the section about the administration where a paragraph can be added to explain that the area was a union territory and coterminous district up to 26 Jan 2020 and then only a district thereafter. Cordyceps-Zombie (talk) 08:13, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just surfing thru Wikipedia. Describing the Warli as a "non-Aryan" people seemed a bit Hitleresque to me although I appreciate the word has a meaning relating to Indo-European origins. According to elsewhere in Wikipedia, the Warli are Indo-European and thereby Aryan if one wishes to use that word. I will edit this. Other parts, for example Koknas "are better cultivators than the Warlis" are opinion and should probably be reviewed.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dadra_and_Nagar_Haveli_district&oldid=1257177505"