Talk:DaVita
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Contested deletion
[edit]I do not see how this is promotional at all. Purely informative... Can you give me a specific reason for its removal? --TheWikiCreator7 (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Greetings. There are actually two issues with this article. Firstly, it is unambiguously promotional - even if the only purpose is to "inform," well that's the same thing. Secondly, there is no indication of significance - in other words, why should Wikipedia have an article about this company? I suggest using the Article Creation wizard in future, and submitting your drafts for review. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Consider renaming to "DaVita"
[edit]The article for DaVita redirects to this page.
DaVita the company is a Fortune 500 company publically listed on the NYSE as DVA[1]. DaVita Medical Group is a subsidary that was sold to UnitedHealth Group in 2017. I propose that DaVita be the subject of the article, and DaVita Medical Group should be a subsection within it.
Bravemidwesterner (talk) 00:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Other options:
- 1. Redirect DaVita to Davita Inc. (only) and use a hatnote to point to DaVita Medical Group.
- 2. Make DaVita a disambiguation page with links to both Davita Inc. and DaVita Medical Group
- -- ℜob C. alias ALAROB 17:16, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
DaVita and Political Lobbying
[edit]It might be worth mentioning the role DaVita has played in lobbying California politics. In 2018, Prop 8 was opposed by DaVita and Fresenius who spent a combined $111 million to defeat a bill aimed at limiting companies profits off of dialysis at 15%. DaVita also pays the AKF to entice patients to sign up for their private insurance plan that charges ~4% more than medicare.
Pretty scammy and well documented on many sources.
https://www.modernhealthcare.com/legal/whistleblower-alleges-davita-fresenius-involved-kickback-scheme https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/opinion/california-ballot-initiatives-direct-democracy.html https://prospect.org/health/california-cracks-down-on-dialysis-profiteering/ Weuerle (talk) 06:40, 23 March 2020 (UTC)