Jump to content

Talk:DOSAAF

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice

[edit]

Well, interesting, but reading about the second title is really tough - I couldn't get any, you know :) To many letters. But cool (:) Um, I was going to tell to you about the point: (sure it's not my business, but) word 'society' doesn't seem to be appropriate to the content. Recognizable is, f.i., 'movement', 'organization', 'club'. It's more suitable for English-speaking person. But again - sorry - that's to my point of view: and may be you know that better.195.135.237.19 (talk) 16:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:06, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DOSAAF vs Dosaaf ofg Russia

[edit]

DOSAAF of Russia is a different organization, not the same as USSSR DOSAADF, just as Nazi Germany is not the same as Bundesrepublic Deutchland and Poland is not the same as Polish People's Poland. Because Russia is not Soviet union, although in the Western brains they were always the same: ("Russians are coming!"). and just as The precursor of DOSAAF, OSOAVIAKhIM, is not then same as DOSAAF. And KGB is not the same as Cheka, although KGBists still called themselves 'chekists'. And of course FSB is not KGB. I can name you a hundred more cases of continuity for people who dont bother to speak correctly, but an encyclopedia had to keep things clear. - Altenmann >talk 18:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]