This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 July 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article is one huge advert, and where are the references?
This article reads like a press release or like it was copied from the cover of this artist's cd. A subjective and pov statement like: "Tiga has been praised by critics by using his mixing skills in this compilation to elaborate on and add excitement to the otherwise cold and inaccessible electro scene" do not belong in an encyclopedic article: praised?? -- what praise?, which critics?, what mixing skills?, elaborate?? -- how?, add excitement?? -- what does that mean?, otherwise cold and inaccessible electro scene?? -- what does that mean, and who said it is? The article had been speedy deleted as blatant advertising; the speedy delete was arbitrarily reversed and should not have been. This article is clearly blatant advertising for the album. 72.76.77.18511:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
