Jump to content

Talk:D3O

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

section missing topic

[edit]

Nice start, never even heard of this until today, but this article needs a lot of fill-in. Marking with tech-stub template.Radiooperator 18:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, no one ever seems to cover whether or not this stuff can be cut, in the case of a knife. The focus seems to be entirely on the fact that sudden, extreme force causes it to harden instantly, then return to its pliable state. Any information on this regard would be an excellent edition. 204.17.179.2 20:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Ken[reply]

section missing topic

[edit]

Just did a bit of grammatical & layout clean up, plus seemed to have a bit of marketing speak ('actively incorporated' my shiny metal behind) which I changed to normal human language. As to the above question - I would guess little or no protection from cutting in current form; think of the personal shields in Dune, maybe? ;-) Surrealknife 05:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

section missing topic

[edit]

This page still reads a bit too much like marketing/advertising to me. Any independent scientific research available on this material? Comments by material experts? 134.58.253.56 (talk) 14:22, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

d30 nano?

[edit]

I remember hearing about a material like this under development a couple of years ago. Does d30 involve any nano-materials? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cronked (talkcontribs) 18:26, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Handgum

[edit]

This seems dubious, the pictures in the Russian wiki don't match up with the description here. But I can't read russian, and i find this hilarious, so I'll let somebody else delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.178.237 (talk) 21:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At the Russian wiki, in the interlanguage links (lefthand sidebar), the link back to the English site is pointing to Silly Putty. Hence, I've removed that sentence from our article. Thanks for the thoughts :) -- Quiddity (talk) 23:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

intelligent molecules

[edit]

The following sounds more like marketing-speak: "It is made of intelligent molecules and is thus categorized into smart fabrics and intelligent textiles" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.14.23 (talk) 16:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

no mention of "Non-Newtonian Fluids"

[edit]

Howard from NYC (talk) 03:16, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

missing "Non-Newtonian Fluids"... also missing links to wiki entries about "Non-Newtonian Fluids"

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on D3o. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on D3o. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]