Talk:D-Link G604T network adaptor
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:D-Link G604T Network Adaptor)
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 17 August 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
The article D-Link G604T Network Adaptor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- There is no verifiability, its all original research and its not a notable product. Find at least one neutral review, or really this article should go.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jez t e C 19:07, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Further to the above. I work for HP Networking as a Technical Consultant, and fully understand the WP:NPOV. I would love to see an article for every single one of my 2000 product lines, but its never going to happen. A product must be notable, otherwise at best it should sit inside a proposed List of D-Link products and nowhere else. This article seems to be a violation of WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:NOR and unless anyone disagrees differently it really should be deleted Jez t e C 19:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- User:Gorrad removed the PROD tag from the front page, with the comment and a link to a review at http://www.testfreaks.com/wireless-network/d-link-dsl-g604t/ ... ok, that's a fair attempt, but its not really a [[1]] is it? Any comments why PROD can't be re-added?? Jez t e C 20:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)