Talk:Démarche

Error and bias

There is a confusion in this article between a piece of formal correspondence and a diplomatic tactic or manoevre. The meaning of the word "demarche", in Miriam Webster, substantiates these two meanings as:

"1. (a): a course of action (b): a diplomatic or political initiative or maneuver

2. : a petition or protest presented through diplomatic channels"

The article seems to be based upon an attempt to unify these two distinct uses via the etymology of the word, which comes from the French verb for: "to march".

I have taken the liberty of editing the opening paragraph to clarify this.

As there is no ownership here of the tag placed on the article, and therefore now way of knowing if the issue is resolved to the tagger's or Wikipedia's satisfaction, I would like to take ownership of it as the article, through the overwhelming detailed reference to US procedures clearly does not reflect the use of demarches in other countries. There is also no discussion of its place in diplomatic procedures or examples of its use in a series of diplomatic moves. LookingGlass (talk) 12:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Dalai Lama

someone add the chinese demarche re Dalai Lama? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.83.179 (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2007 {UTC}

Diplomatic Note

Is "diplomatic note" a synonym for "démarche"? Squideshi (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

This article reads like a US state dept training manual

I know it's easy to complain about and hard to solve problems. But I just want to add input that this whole article has serious problems:

• It's unsourced - no citations
• It reads like it has been copied from someplace else, probably a US gov't document.
• It doesn't include information on a world-wide viewpoint.

I don't really know how to fix it (I was coming to this page to learn about the subject) but I thought I'd at least contribute some input on directions that would help at least this reader. Stevemidgley (talk) 05:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Front channel cable?

What is one of those then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.184.176 (talk) 08:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Démarche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091130034340/http://www.state.gov/m/a/dir/regs/fah/05fah01/index.htm to http://www.state.gov/m/a/dir/regs/fah/05fah01/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)