Talk:D'Andrea Picks

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from dandreapicks.com. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2008122510005054.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Untitled

I have permission to use anything from dandreapicks.com because I am the webmaster and the art and advertising director.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pookerella (talk • contribs) 07:01, 25 December 2008

Removed notice

Please note: All information that is not in Mr. Hoover's book has been provided by Mr. Anthony D'Andrea, President of D'Andrea Picks, i.e., his recollections and personal accounts of what was told to him by his father and grandfather. This page is posted at the request of Mr. D'Andrea. No written information exists, other than pamphlets and the dandreapicks.com website. Anyone who wishes to challenge the validity of this information can go to the website and fill out the request for information form and we will be happy to verify that this information is valid and true.

This is not appropriate for inclusion in the article itself, so I have moved it here. 173.48.171.244 (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article purpose

is this article about the picks, the company,or the family? Not sure if it needs to be split or renamed.Heds (talk) 01:25, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re JW Hyatt

I've found one reference that says that Hyatt actually acquired the patent to what he termed 'celluloid' in 1868, from English chemist Alexander Parkes. (Parkes discovered 'Parkesine' in 1855 and patented it. It's the same substance. Parkes tried to manufacture 'parkesine' but that business failed ... in 1868.) It's possible that Hyatt indicated that he had invented the substance... he didn't. Check out Federal Reporter v. 207, 1914. p. 357-8, e.g. on Google books. Twang (talk) 08:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saga of celluloid

That section, though copied with OTRS permission from http://dandreapicks.com/celluloid.html, was actually plagiarised by that website from Extraordinary origins of everyday things. Charles Panati - 1987. I've removed it, and it was redundant to Celluloid anyway. Fences&Windows 15:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on D'Andrea Picks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120801204106/http://www.dandreausa.com/history.html to http://www.dandreausa.com/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]