Talk:Czech Lute

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical music: Compositions

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Choral or madrigal?

I filed this under "choral compositions," but would it be appropriate to file it instead, or additionally, under "madrigals," since it was originally for four people? What is it like musically? –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:30, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not too much of an expert on this topic, but a madrigal is a secular piece of vocal music, while the Czech Lute has distinct references to religion. I am not quite sure about filing it under choral either, because it was, as you said, originally written for four voices. Musically it does not only include voices, but also a couple of early Baroque instruments, you can listen to it on youtube under the Czech title "Loutna Česká." Highschoolpuppettier (talk) 09:39, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Direct quote with no source?

I noticed that the last paragraph of the first section seems to quote the music director of Ensemble Inégal, but the linked sources are just short excerpts from recordings of the music with no spoken word whatsoever. The quote doesn't seem to appear in the linked NYT article either. This quote is hardly inconsequential. I found @BarunH to be the contributor of this - could you, or someone, please clarify this? 85.207.121.53 (talk) 06:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]