This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 2/21/2019 by TheMesquito.
AWCzarnik (talk·contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. ([1])
This page should not be speedy deleted as an attack or a negative unsourced biography of a living person, because it's only purpose is to teach a precedent in U.S. Patent juris prudence new in its 218-year existence. There is no defamatory content in the article whatsoever. In addition, there is no reference to a living person other than the Plaintiff, which is publicly-available information. --AWCzarnik (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted the WP:CSD G10 attack page template notification and associated blanking of content. I have explained this both at the Teahouse, and in this note on the Talk Page of Barbara (WVS) who also replied at the Teahouse just before I did, and placed the template and blanked the page as a courtesy. (Note that all this was done in Good Faith). I don't think the fine detail at the beginning helped one bit (I also thought you were on a mission to 'out' your former employer at first sight, but then realised this wasn't so).
I would urge you to follow my advice, and restructure this draft as soon as possible to conform to the layout of other encyclopaedic legal case study articles. (Here are some supreme court ones to look at: Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court) If, as I suggest, you delete extraneous content immediately, you can always find it again in the edit history of the page, so nothing is lost completely unless it gets formally deleted by an administrator. But even then, deleted content can be reinstated upon request to that administrator or on further appeal. Note that it's very bad form to edit another user's sandbox without invitation, but if you would like some assistance, just let me know and I'll make any tweaks that I'm able. I still recommend putting this to the WikiProject Law group via its talk page or via WP:requested articles, rather than trying to create the mainspace article yourself. I think you're too closely involved, and others may also jump to conclusions regarding your motives. Whether the topic meets out notability criteria is something others must judge, as I'm totally out of my comfort zone in legal topics. Regards Nick Moyes (talk) 15:56, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
