Talk:Cyprus in the Eurovision Song Contest 2018

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyprus in the Eurovision Song Contest 2018/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 01:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be reviewing this. Comments should be added here in the next few days. Kingsif (talk) 01:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Style

• lead good length for article
• standard of English in some areas not great, done some clean-up as example
• The background section appears to use every synonym of "edition" known to man in describing the contest. Consistency would be appreciated. Replace all the (especially "iteration") with 'contest'.
• Background section written quite well
• "detailed informational text release" - a communique?
  • The sentence that this is in should also be restructured to put 'the details of the set of rules regarding the requirements of potential entrants' before the form of communication. And the time period is ungrammatical here, suggest giving it another sentence to say "The entry period was slated..."
• "his/her" can be 'their'
• Maybe wikilink Cypriot citizenship since it's kind of important
• Wikilink bookmakers
• The description of the performance in the semi-final needs some rewriting.
• Some areas could have improved writing, but not bad enough to absolutely need it; for FA would recommend a copyedit
• The split voting tables don't seem to make sense, very unclear on what they're showing.
• Needs attention Just a few things need looking at

Coverage

• Lead coverage seems good
• Background coverage good except for the mention of pre-2016 selection, which is a few years past and so irrelevant to the background of this article - but given the info on how the votes were planned to happen in 2018, perhaps keeping the info and saying this had been planned to happen in 2018 with a ref
• In "Internal selection", is it important to mention the 2017 artist and result? Did this have some impact on the meetings held? If so, this should be stated - otherwise, irrelevant.
• "Preparation" is to-the-point but seems to cover the details.
• "At Eurovision" top body gives a good overview of the Cypriot contest details
• I think that the explanation of Eurovision voting being so detailed is excessive; a link to the section of the ESC article could be included with a condensed version of the voting format
• Would like some more coverage of Cyprus' voting, even if just "oh damn they didn't vote for Greece"... but I'm sure there's more
• Needs attention Some things need to be done

Illustration

• Tables seem suitable
• One image, in the middle. Are there absolutely no other relevant images (e.g. of composer, Foureira, the various qualifiers and competitions?)
  • There's a whole category of free images to choose from. It's a long article, at least put one in the infobox.
• Fail

Neutrality

• Seems good
• Pass

Verifiability

• Has some tabloid sources, would give the sources a check against WP:Perennial sources
• Needs a check

Stability

• Bit of a dispute in April/June? - recommend keeping it on watch
• Pass

Copyright

• Check seems fine
• Commons image seems correctly licensed
• Pass

Overall

•  On hold Just some things to look at and some should-be easy fixes. Kingsif (talk) 22:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
  • @Kingsif: Have made some edits in response to the queries above except for the infobox image because the template for this type of article does not have the code to allow for it. MWright96 (talk) 16:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
    • @MWright96: Thanks, yes, looked good when I last saw it - odd about the infobox but it's not necessary for the event. I'll give it another look and be back in a few minutes. Kingsif (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
    • Nice work! Kingsif (talk) 17:20, 19 September 2019 (UTC)