Talk:Cyntech
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]To be included in Wikipedia, you must show that a company meets WP:CORP. All articles must meet WP:N and WP:V. Also, no original research is allowed per WP:OR. If you get to work providing information following the guidelines, your article will not have a problem. Mattisse(talk) 20:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Article issues
[edit]- This article was created in 2006 using the company "official website" in the "External links" section as sourcing . This goes against several policies and guidelines, that at best is company advertising or promotion just providing a Wikipedia business listing, as well as issues mentioned in the "Untitled" section above. Claims of original research cannot be argued against.
- It is easy to ignore the "rules" and create articles, which should only take place when there are clear benefits to Wikipedia and still subjected to consensus, but 12 years later we are at the same place. If there is no sourcing or the article can not be merged to some sourced parent article then it should be deleted. Otr500 (talk) 18:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Agree with these points.
- Should be deleted. Who is the agent to do so? AmazonExplorer (talk) 07:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- Automatically assessed Companies articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Stub-Class energy articles
- Low-importance energy articles