Talk:Cyclone Hamoon/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: OhHaiMark (talk · contribs) 13:01, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 02:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
On a cursory inspection, this article seems to be close to meeting the Good Article criteria already and is certainly a good read. I will start my review shortly. simongraham (talk) 02:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- Overall, the standard of the article is high.
- It is of substantial length, with 1,354 words of readable prose.
- The lead is appropriately long at 204 words.
- Authorship is 84.6% from the nominator with contributions from 19 other editors.
- It is currently assessed as a Stub class article but has seen extensive editing since being assessed on 24 October 2023, with a particularly significant edit on 9 September 2024.
- Although not a GA criteria, suggest adding ALT text for accessibility.
- Please remove duplicate links to Barisal District, Chittagongm, Cox's Bazar and Lakshmipur District.
Criteria
[edit]The six good article criteria:
- It is reasonable well written.
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
- The writing is clear and appropriate.
- Please rephrase "the disturbance had became a depression" to either "the disturbance had become a depression" or "the disturbance became a depression".
- Suggest replacing "fishers" with "fishermen".
- Suggest adding a comma after "803 shelters were opened".
- I can see no other obvious spelling or grammar errors.
- it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
- Please check numbers conform to MOS:NUMERAL.
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- A reference section is included, with sources listed.
- Please add a trans-title in English for the Burmese title.
- all inline citations are from reliable sources;
- Sources are a range of government information sources and contemporary newspapers. The latter are primary sources and so WP:PRIMARY applies.
- it contains no original research;
- All relevant statements have inline citations.
- Spot checks confirm both Hossain & Islam and the Regional Specialised Meteorological Centre articles seem to cover the topic. Statements appear backed up.
- it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism;
- Earwig gives a 12.3% chance of copyright violation, which means that it is unlikely. The closest phrasing is with an article on the TBS website that includes the phrase "ships on the Lakshmipur-Bhola-Barishal route and ferries on the Lakshmipur-Bhola route".
- it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- It is broad in its coverage
- it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
- The article covers main aspects of the storm and its impact.
- it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
- The article goes into an appropriate level of detail.
- it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
- It has a neutral point of view.
- it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
- The article seems balanced with a good information on the impact in different countries.
- it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
- It is stable.
- it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- There is no evidence of edit wars.
- it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
- The images have appropriate PD tags, apart from the animation Hamoon 2023-10-23 2310Z-2023-10-24 0310Z.gif, which has a Japanese government CC tag.
- images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
- The images are appropriate.
- images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
@OhHaiMark: Thank you for an interesting article. Please take a look at my comments above and ping me when you would like me to take another look. simongraham (talk) 02:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done. How does it look now? OhHaiMark (talk) 15:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)