Talk:Cycling Without Age

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the page has been made in good faith, but by a novice user who has indeed lifted text directly from the source. I will have a go at reworking the article summary / stub with original text --RadishSlice _talk 19:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I tried, but my changes were reverted by User:Praxidicae. Not clear what I've done wrong. -RadishSlice _talk 21:03, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: what has happened - did I not contest the speedy deletion correctly? Where has my work gone, and why was it reverted? - RadishSlice _talk 01:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The new content I wrote for the stub page was less than 2.5% on the Copyvio tool (matching on names and job titles) - RadishSlice _talk 01:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This section should be obsolete since I rewrote the whole article... --Wribln (talk) 11:52, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

CWA global chapter.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]