Talk:Culture of Morocco/Archive 1

Archive 1

The layout of pictures

I noticed that the placement of the 2 main pictures was changed. I agree about the Wikipedia pictures layout but these 2 pictures resumes all article. I believe the original layout to be kept. Cheers and respect Svest 17:46, May 14, 2005 (UTC) Wiki me up™

The pictures are bad

A picture of Delacroix is the worst you can choose for this page. It is orientalism/colonialsm. (Read Edward Saïd.) Also the picture of the woman in "tradional clothing" is totally wrong. Pictures in a general introcuction like this should give a general impression of the average Moroccan and life as yoy can see it on the streets. The first two pictures are okayS710 19:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Djellaba

Someone deleted the Wikipedia article for Djellaba. Next, the link for djellaba here points to a woman's garment. Does some vandelistic admin have it in for male Moroccan style of dress? I would encourage you to review "Raiders of the Lost Ark," staring Harrison Ford. The Morrocan scenes are replete with men in djellabas, and djellabas are still worn in Morrocco by men regularly.

Please reinstate the djellaba article and fix the link, as it's the right thing to do. Ensure Wikipedia reflects reality, rather than personal bias. Thank you. Mugaliens 18:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

It was deleted because it was a copyvio. I unlinked it to Jilbab pending recreation. -- Szvest 18:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

---

Berbers and Carthagians

The article says: Morocco hosted many people coming from both East (Berbers, Phoenicians,. This is not correct, The Berbers cannot be considered and easterns, and cannot be considered as "hosted people" like as the the other foreign peopeles. The Berbers are considered to be indegenous to Morocco. The Carthagians is also not correct, the Carthagians are not people. But a country. This country was inhabited by the Poenicians and Berbers. Read3r 17:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Copyright Issues?

I found the exact wording of the section titled "art" on this website: http://www.morocco.com/culture/ Is that a copyright violation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bouncingbear (talk • contribs) 06:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

I agree with the previous statement as the art section soundlike a travel brochure or something along that lines. (Missydreamchic (talk) 22:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC))

I don't know about a copy-vio, but much of this article is a disgrace. As you say, a large section of it reads like a tourist brochure, and a pretty trite and condescending one at that. I'd also take issue with some of the broad statements such as "Morocco has set among its top priorities the protection of its diversity and the preservation of its cultural heritage". This is certainly not the view of many of the Berbers of Morocco: 35% speak Amazigh as their mother tongue yet the government has for decades been set on a programme of "arabisation" - their is little or no education available in Amazigh and it has no official status at all in the country (how does that chime with "the protection of its diversity and the preservation of its cultural heritage"? I'm tempted to remove some of the more obvious peacock terms and brochure-speak, for starters, but if the whole art section is indeed a copy-vio perhaps that should be removed (or completely rewritten)? Enaidmawr (talk) 23:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

The text was a clear copy-vio (see here). I've removed it as per WP:COPYVIO. Enaidmawr (talk) 23:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Culture of Morocco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050623075855/http://www.mincom.gov.ma/english/gallery/music/music.html to http://www.mincom.gov.ma/english/gallery/music/music.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 April 2021 and 26 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Inexperienced Egg. Peer reviewers: April.k0ala, Igotnooname.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)