Talk:CruiseControl

This page was proposed for deletion by 85.48.185.48 (talk · contribs) in the past with the comment:
Not notable. There are no independent sources
It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 2020-10-23 with the comment:
Poor sourcing is not a valid WP:DEL-REASON

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

CruiseControl.Net or CruiseControl.NET?

If there are no strenuous objections I'd like to revert back to CruiseControl.Net, as recommended by the Wikipedia Manual of Style: Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks), which says "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, regardless of the preference of the trademark owner."

(Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not 100% consistent - see this discussion: Talk:.NET_Framework#Title )

--RenniePet (talk) 16:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement?

I'm afraid parts of this article (section Build Reporting) read like an advertisement or sales presentation. Could someone who knows better about the wikipedia standards than me have a look if this is according to the guidelines? Thank you.

Examples:

The left side of the page tells us about […]

The dashboard is a powerful tool […]

Previous project build result is colour-coded so that one can get an instant snapshot of howthe projects are doing at the moment.

The last is not even a full sentence. It reads like taken from a powerpoint presentation.

The 'Builds' tab of the dashboard shows all projects (colour-coded) sorted by name providing some more information.

This sounds good without being informative. 'Some more information'? What information? 62.80.17.84 (talk) 10:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]