Jump to content

Talk:Crown Fountain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleCrown Fountain is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 17, 2011.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 25, 2007Good article nomineeListed
January 1, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 12, 2008WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
March 31, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 19, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 22, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 9, 2008Good topic candidatePromoted
July 26, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
September 6, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
September 27, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
October 17, 2011Today's featured articleMain Page
January 25, 2022Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 18, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Chicago's Crown Fountain (pictured) displays LED images of faces, which typically create the illusion of puckered lips spouting water?
Current status: Featured article


Photo requests

[edit]

This article would be greatly assisted by some photographs for which a great deal of hard-to-follow verbiage now serves:

  • close up of an LED brick
  • close up of the water spout
  • close up of the top
  • overview and close up of the LED supporting structure

204.153.43.107 19:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA On Hold

[edit]

I have placed this article on hold because of one thing. The opening sentence of the article says that the fountain is 'interactive,' however, after reading the article through, I fail to find out how the fountain is interactive. Since this seems to be an important part of the fountain, this needs to be added before the article can become a GA. If this is indeed in the article, it should be clarified, because I, as an outside reader, was not able to determine it. When you are done, or if you have any questions, drop a note on my talk page. Cheers, Corvus coronoides talk 15:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note the sentence "a plastic nozzle was fitted to the stainless steel frame to control the waterflow at a rate that will not cause the city to be liable for injury by interactive participants" discusses interactivity. I will add more.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Italic text==GA Passed== I have passed this article for GA as the issue above was resolved. It's an interesting article on an interesting topic. Keep working on it! Cheers, Corvus coronoides talk 16:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article doesn't have a lead. It could be broken down into a few sections. It's also overly illustrated, sandwiching text between images. LARA♥LOVE 22:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment

[edit]

not only not in this sentence; In fact, many report that they have not only not seen their own digitized image, but have yet to hear of anyone who has seen their own image Negation Use consider revising.SriMesh | talk 03:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Featured article

[edit]

I believe this is a fantastic article, but I was surprised when I found out it was only a GA. I think this article could presently pass a FA assessment, and if not, it could with a couple of edits. I am willing to help out to get this article to FA status. Right now, I am going to put the article up for peer review in the hopes of getting this ball rolling. Torsodog (talk) 18:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy Editing

[edit]

So, I have a new version of this article ready to go with a few more copy edits, but I was unable to post it because you have started to revert the edits. I've looked through the article's FAC pages several times and I am inclined to agree with the user TONY. The article is far too overlinked. While I believe some of his suggestions are go overboard, I too think you go a bit overboard. There needs to be a compromise, though it doesn't seem as though you are will to compromise. Torsodog (talk) 07:45, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAC copyedit questions

[edit]

I have done the lead and first paragraph after. I have a question aboiut this sentence: This capstone status evolved from its location: east of Michigan Avenue and across from the Chicago Landmark Historic Michigan Boulevard District; north of Monroe Street and the Art Institute of Chicago; west of the rest of the park and the lake; and south of Madison Street and the McCormick Tribune Plaza and Ice Rink. Since Millennium Park is the capstone, the sentence seems to be referring to it, but the description is of the location of Crown Fountain within Millennium Park. How about just The fontain has a prominent location in Chicago and the new park: east of Michigan Avenue and across from the Chicago Landmark Historic Michigan Boulevard District; north of Monroe Street and the Art Institute of Chicago; west of the rest of the park and the lake; and south of Madison Street and the McCormick Tribune Plaza and Ice Rink. ? Please let me know if I have introduced any errors. I am stopping for now, will be back in several hours Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That change would be fine.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks - thanks too for fixing the Front Yard bit. Hopefully the rest of my copyedits are OK. Will do more shortly, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 11:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another one - where is the Raoul Wallenberg Square where Plensa's Star of David sculpture is? Is it at the United States Holocaust Museum in Washington DC? (But that is Raoul Wallenberg Place). If so, we could link that. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

construction picture

[edit]

What do we think of this picture? I've used this person's work for Cloud Gate in the past, so it is possible to get permission to use this free image. Is it worth going after? --TorsodogTalk 02:10, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Permanently installed artwork in the United States does not qualify for freedom of panorama. Is there any particular reason why the images in this article would be any different? It is pretty simple artwork, but I believe it is artwork protected by copyright nonetheless. NW (Talk) 20:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. For what it is worth, the FAC was reviewed with these images by both Jappalang and J Milburn, who felt the images were free unless the videos were being displayed on the fountain. Could you say which images you specifically have trouble with? Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I certainly trust Jappalang's opinion on the images. The main image I was thinking of was File:20080728 Crown Fountain at night (flank view) of south tower2.jpg. The lead image is tagged with a non-free fair use tag, so I thought maybe that might have to be as well. NW (Talk) 16:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. For what it's worth, the image in question shows the back side of the fountain (which is lit internally), so the blue light is not from the LED display on the front. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Crown Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:37, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Crown Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crown Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crown Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prose banner

[edit]

@Ppt91: in 2021 you added the yellow banner at the top of the page expressing concerns about the article being overly detailed. Do you still have these concerns? If so, would you be willing to post a notice about your concerns below and perhaps bring this to FAR in a few weeks? Z1720 (talk) 16:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Crown_Fountain&oldid=1205140569"