Jump to content

Talk:Croatian language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1RR

[edit]

This article has become another battleground. Enough is, quite frankly, enough of the edit warring, as the article is now protected for the fourth time since July due to it. We're going to try something new. Starting now, this article; under the discretionary sanctions authorised in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia; is hereby placed on a 1RR restriction. This means one revert, per user, per day. This restriction is per person, not per account. The most obvious vandalism is excepted from this restriction, and I do mean obvious. This restriction applies to all users, and I will place an edit notice of this for the article. Any appeals should be directed towards my talk page in the first instance, or Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement in the second. Courcelles 11:52, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above timestamp has intentionally been moved forward 15 years, to stop automatic archival. True timestamp: Courcelles 11:53, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 May 2024

[edit]

Croatian is Recognised minority language in Romania (Caraș-Severin) Balkanshepard (talk) 14:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 14:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 August 2024

[edit]

It is not correct that Croatian language is part of the Serbo-Croatian language. The name Serbo-Croatian language (spoken in Serbia Republic of Yugoslavia) was created during the Yugoslavia time, as well as the Croatian-Serbian language which was 'spoken' in Croatia Republic of Yugoslavia. Please delete this incorrect and misleading statement. Wiksources (talk) 17:38, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.
The text as-is is extensively sourced. Do you have reason to believe all of those sources are incorrect? --AntiDionysius (talk) 17:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2024

[edit]

In the 'Writing systems' section, add 'Arabica (historical)' due to Glagolitic and Bosnian Cyrillic having been listed as historically used writing systems. Zalihost (talk) 20:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand the logical connection that is supposed to be expressed by the "due to". Glagolitic and Bosnian Cyrillic have been used by Croats (Catholics), there's no doubt about that. That doesn't say anything about their usage of arabica (arebica), which was a writing system primarily used by Muslims/Bosniaks. I've managed to find only some tenuous claims that Croats used arabica (the author includes Mehmed Erdeljac and Hasan Kaimija in the Croatian literary corpus – but those names don't sound typically Croatian...). If you have some better sources for this topic that go into more detail, please point to them. – Phazd (talk|contribs) 17:47, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]