Talk:Criticism of the Kyoto Protocol

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to climate change, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

False judgment

There is no attack involved in the page. Where is the speedy deletion link. Kasaalan (talk) 14:01, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rising Tide

- Rising Tide http://scx.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/30/3/355.pdf SAGE Publications academic resource WP:RS
- Rising Tide http://risingtide.org.uk/resources/factsheets/carbontrading fact sheet for quick overview of their objections
- Rising Tide http://eprints.qut.edu.au/15793/1/John_Pace_Thesis.pdf academic thesis WP:RS
- Rising Tide reviewed in academic thesis http://envstudies.brown.edu/theses/kellynicholsthesis.pdf
- Rising Tide in http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/49703?show=full http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/49703/436283959.pdf?sequence=1 scholar WP:RS mentioning Rising Tide North America members for Carbon Capture and Storage protests
  "Furthermore, Greenpeace Joined 38 smaller organizations in sending a letter to Congress asking that no taxpayer funds be used to develop CCS.<ref> Three of these organizations were also responsible for organizing a protest against coal outside the coal-burning Capitol Power Plant in Washington D.C. on March 2, 2009. Anti-coal advocates including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Bill McKibben, and James Hansen joined the 2,500 protestors, making it the country's largest protest against coal power (Sheppard 2009). <ref> The 39 groups include: ActionPA, Alliance for Appalachia, Appalachian Voices, Black Mesa Water Coalition, California Communities Against Toxics, Canary Coalition, Cape & Islands Self-Reliance Corporation, Center for Coalfield Justice, Co-op America, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Clean Power Now, Coal River Mountain Watch [1], Cook Inletkeeper [2], Energy Justice Network [3], Environmental Alliance of North Florida, Environmental Research Foundation (maybe Applied Environmental Research Foundation not sure), Friends of the Earth, Global Exchange, The Grand Canyon Trust [4] (founded by Huey Johnson), Green Delaware, Greenpeace, Heartwood (not sure if it is Heartwood House or not), Help Our Polluted Environment, Indigenous Environmental Network [5] [6] [7] [8], Jefferson Action Group, Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Meigs Citizen Action Now, Mountain Watershed Association, North Carolina Waste Awareness & Reduction Network [9], Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Palm Beach County Environmental Coalition, Protect Biodiversity in Public Forests, Rainforest Action Network, Residents Against the Power Plant, Rising Tide North America, Save It Now, Glades!, Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Southern Energy Network, and Valley Watch. (Rainforest Network 2008)."
  so we are talking about a big coalition of smaller environmentalist groups
- PolicyLink http://policylink.info/documents/climatechange_final.pdf report section 4 criticizes taking only CO2 emmisions, links to Rising Tide
- SinksWatch "an initiative of the World Rainforest Movement ... The aim of SinksWatch is to track and scrutinize carbon sequestration projects related to the Kyoto Protocol, and to highlight their threats to forests and other ecosystems, to forest peoples as well as to the climate." another group that opposes carbon trading http://www.sinkswatch.org/campaign/presentations http://www.sinkswatch.org/sites/fern.org/files/Montreal%202008%20-%20Why%20carbon%20offsets%20are%20a%20dangerous%20distraction_0.pdf http://www.sinkswatch.org/sites/fern.org/files/NYC%202008%20-%20climate%20change%20privatisation%20and%20power.pdf ...
So basically Rainforest Network and Stop Climate Chaos are coalitions of dozens of smaller environmentalist groups which should be taken seriously.

External links. Kasaalan (talk) 14:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article probation

Please note that, by a decision of the Wikipedia community, this article and others relating to climate change (broadly construed) has been placed under article probation. Editors making disruptive edits may be blocked temporarily from editing the encyclopedia, or subject to other administrative remedies, according to standards that may be higher than elsewhere on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation for full information and to review the decision. Replies to this message will not be read - please address any follow-up comments to Wikipedia talk:General sanctions/Climate change probation. -- ChrisO (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Criticism of the Kyoto Protocol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Criticism of the Kyoto Protocol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]