Jump to content

Talk:Criticism of Hamas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I/P articles

[edit]

how do you add pages to I/P conflict so they can't be edited? this page was a spinoff, there has been a overly detailed template since 2014, but I don't know how to make sure its protected like other I/P articles, would appreciate advice on this, thanks. Seraphimsystem (talk) 06:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can file a request at WP:RFPP. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Criticism of Hamas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?!

[edit]

Can you please write also an article about "criticism" of ISIS? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:6500:A044:4F8F:B157:72A9:4086:746E (talk) 10:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you mean Islamic State. That article has a whole section with several sub-sections devoted to criticism of the organization; it just doesn't use the word in its heading. The reason this is a separate article is that somebody has split this article out of the article about Hamas, due to its size. This article is really a sub-section of the article about Hamas, but is presented as a separate article. It is not a stand-alone article, and needs to be read as part of the main article about Hamas. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 11:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And is that made clear and easily accessible? Snir102 (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Follow the link to Islamic State § International reaction. There are several criticism sub-sections, which, I think, makes the commentary easily accessible. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 21:22, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No new elections

[edit]

The “No new elections” subsection of the “Political freedoms” section is factually correct, but without any attributed critic it reads like WP:OR. Can we add someone who has actually engaged this criticism? Bernie Sanders wrote an op-Ed making this comment, to my memory.

but it should probably also be balanced for WP:DUE as I’d anticipate a counter-argument that places blame at the door of Fatah and the blockade. Yr Enw (talk) 12:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Human shields

[edit]

The human shields section largely discusses alleged violations by not taking sufficient precautions, which is distinct from human shielding. This section should be edited to reflect that, probably be split into two sections: something to the effect of "not taking sufficient precautions" and "human shields". DMH43 (talk) 21:20, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Child Labor

[edit]

The information regarding 160 dead kids in tunnels is flat-out false. The 2012 article by Pelham in JPS was talking about deaths in the largely private commercial tunnels to Egypt, which numbered OVERALL at 160. The JPS accidentally added the "children" qualifier at a later stage of editing, and issued a correction afterwards. Tablet Magazine which is cited reported this wrong statistics, and it was repeated by netanyahu. It has no basis in fact and the paragraph should be removed. 95.112.2.1 (talk) 01:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]