Talk:Critias (dialogue)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Ancient Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Ancient philosophy

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Where is the oldest preserved copy of this title?

Could you provide link to good quality scan/picture of it?

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A comma between a subject and a predicate

Athens in those days, was very different.
The correct way is either to remove the comma, or add a second one - after "Athens". Even though I'm generally allergic to any commas between a subject and a predicate, I've gone for the latter here as it sounds more decent.--Adûnâi (talk) 02:44, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The controversy about which Critias it is.

The article states that a group of scholars that argue "that there is too much distance of time between the oligarch Critias (460–403 BC) and Solon (638–558 BC)" and that according to the text "Solon told the story to the great-grandfather of the Critias appearing in this dialogue, Dropides, who then told it to his son, who was also named Critias and the grandfather of the Critias in the dialogue. The elder Critias then retold the story to his grandson when he was 90 and the younger Critias was 10." And then further that this group of scholars "alleges that the tyrant's grandfather could not have both talked to Solon and still have been alive at the time the hypothetical discussion".

Here are given two interpretations of a text, both stated as fact, and the latter just in passing, without pointing out that this is the core of the disagreement, which it surely must be.

The text in the Benjamin Jowett translation of the Timaeus reads: "[Solon] was a relative and a dear friend of my great-grandfather, Dropides, as he himself says in many passages of his poems; and he told the story to Critias, my grandfather, who remembered and repeated it to us."

Because I can't read ancient (or any) Greek, I cannot say whether this is clearer in the original, but it's very ambiguous in English. Either Solon told Dropides the story, who then told the elder Critias, or Solon told him the story directly.

If Critias was born in 460 BC and his grandfather and namesake was 80 years older than him, then he was born in 540 BC; 18 years after Solon died. When there is 80 years difference between grandfather and grandson, having a kid at age 40 must not be far out of the ordinary. Thus, if we assume another 40 years, then the great-grandfather, Dropides, would have been 22 when Solon died. So on this reading there is no impossibility, but since circa 18 years separate the lives of Solon and the elder Critias, there the impossibility is real.

So if anyone could check out what these scholars are actually saying, or read the Timaeus 20d-23e in the original Greek and see if either of those shed some light on this disagreement so the wording in this article could be bettered, that would be great.