Talk:Crich
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Bluegoblin7 21:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Suggestion of Roman occupation
[edit]An edit which has been removed read as follows: Known as "Lutadarum", Crich was a source of lead and silver in Roman times, being listed in the seventh century Ravenna Cosmogeny.
This information was obtained on the website http://www.roman-britain.org/places/lutudarum.htm Roman Britain.org which otherwise scholarly. Crich in fact seems an unlikely source of lead and tin for all it is built on a limestone outcrop. Anton Shone has recently published a well-referenced paper on the possible location of Lutudarm: "Origins and History of Wirksworth: Lutudarum and the Peak District before the Norman Conquest" http://www.conferencesdirect.co.uk/clacton/Lutudarum.pdf Chevin (talk) 09:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Crich. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060719172219/http://www.crichweb.co.uk/ to http://www.crichweb.co.uk/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060719172219/http://www.crichweb.co.uk/ to http://www.crichweb.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 14 August 2017 (UTC)