Talk:Crazing

Glass Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Polymers (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers

Embossing tape

Is the white text of embossing tape due to crazing? —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 11:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Solvent-induced crazing

Should *really* be mentioned. --88.66.5.111 (talk) 14:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

General issues

This article needs some work. Ldm1954 (talk) 08:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well deserved rework of the topic

The article is now very deeply improved. I would just note that the introduction is a bit too long and some concepts are compressed in too few words, while better expressed in the following sections. It would be probably better to streamline the intro and move quickly to the historical stuff, where the phenomenon is indeed very clearly described in non technical words.

Thank you for the great improvement. LuKePicci (talk) 13:23, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I appreciate your feedback about the introduction. While I considered shortening it, I felt it was important to mention topics like crazing in different polymers and stress whitening, even if briefly, to give readers a comprehensive overview. These topics should be expanded in future updates, I welcome others to do so, in order to provide additional depth to the article. FedeJ12 (talk) 14:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

The article sounds very good and is improved very well. I really appreciate the description of the crazing mechanism, distingushing it by different phases. Also the introduction and the historical background are good (probably, they could be summarized). I have correct some very little mistakes and my suggestion is to put more external links, if available, in order to deepen the topic. Thanks for your article and improvement. Ilmaggio98 (talk) 13:31, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the review. I tend to be wordy sometimes I know... I did not find many links I was comfortable sharing because a lot of what is available on internet links lacks enough scientific depth in my opinion. FedeJ12 (talk) 14:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:GLAM/PoliMi/2024 review

Really well written, frankly I couldn't find anything to correct. Great job! Xebe22 (talk) 13:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much I really appreciate it. FedeJ12 (talk) 14:24, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Observations and suggestions for improvements

The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following an expert review of the article within the Science, Technology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in July 2024.

The overview of the contents of the entry with respect to the title is not perfectly centered.

Some inaccuracies are also present undoubtedly due to lack of experience but also due to a not perfectly satisfactory critical review of the content

--Aandurro (talk) 12:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]