Talk:Crawl (2019 film)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 18:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Some Dude from North Carolina, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you shortly. I hope you will find my feedback to be useful. Tayi Arajakate Talk 18:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Some Dude From North Carolina, I have completed the review and it seems to meet the good article criteria on nomination. Good work, I could not locate any issues with it except the one I have mentioned in the comments below. I'm not too concerned about it so I'll promote it to a good article but please do consider it. Tayi Arajakate Talk 14:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- Earwig's copyvio detector brings up a fairly high percentage. Most of this is due to quotes and some false positives. In particular, this seems to be because of a Pepper's quote in the casting section, which I would suggest trimming down a bit and instead summarising what he says. There are some copied phrases as well which I would recommend rephrasing; e.g "months of endurance training", "open his eyes underwater for long periods of time".
Assessment
[edit]- Comprehension: The article is well written.
- Verifiability: The article is verifiable and well researched.
- Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive.
- Neutrality: The article is neutral.
- Stability: The article is stable.
- Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (prose) | The prose is clear and concise. | Pass
|
| (b) (MoS) | The article is compliant with the manual of style. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (references) | Contains all necessary inline citations and a list of references. | Pass
|
| (b) (citations to reliable sources) | Sources used are reliable. | Pass
|
| (c) (original research) | No original research found. | Pass
|
| (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | No major issues with copyright or plagiarism. |  Neutral
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (major aspects) | The article has a broad coverage of all major aspects. | Pass
|
| (b) (focused) | The article remains on topic and without unnecessary deviations. | Pass
|
Pass
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| The article is compliant with the policy of neutral point of view. | Pass
|
Pass
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| No ongoing content disputes, edit warring or major changes. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | Images used are tagged with their appropiate copyright statuses. | Pass
|
| (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | Captions are appropiate. | Pass
|