This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Boxing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoxingWikipedia:WikiProject BoxingTemplate:WikiProject BoxingBoxing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I've posted a note at the Boxing Project in the hope that someone with more knowldge than I will take an interest in helping deciding whether subject meets WP:GNG and providing references.--Plad2 (talk) 06:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Having boxed professionally I would think he meets the requirements, however the Boxing project may have additional input - I'm not bothered either way. In the meantime I've added a basic reference and also his stats from the boxrec website. I also pulled out some of the commentary and POV phrasing in hopes of making it more encylopedic; anything I've removed can be added back in as long of it's referenced and neutral, it's all available in the history. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh18:18, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Although autobiographies are strongly discouraged, is there anything in the article as it stands that you find particularly problematic? A couple editors (including myself) have culled the majority of the self-serving commentary and puffery, and it reads neutrally to me; however you could always edit it back further if you see additional issues. You could also take it to AfD, but I'm not sure that "I think it's an autobiography" will fly as a nomination rationale unless it's tied in with notability concerns. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots13:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
