Talk:Cover-up tattoo
Cover-up tattoo has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 29, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Cover-up tattoo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Untitled
[edit]Cover-ups isn't just about covering old tattoos but also scars, blemishes and other unwanted features on the body. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.224.42.237 (talk) 12:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC) <-- forgot to log in Chosig (talk) 13:02, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Chosig: Very belatedly, Fixed! -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 01:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Veterans with covered scars
[edit]I wanted to add that some veterans with war scars choose to get tattoos to conceal their scars and as part of their psychological healing process, but so far I've only found two decent sources, and they're about individuals rather than a pattern: "Iraqi troops seek tattoos to cover their scars of war" and Warriors, Tattoos, and the Stories They Tell (page 30). Dreamyshade (talk) 20:52, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'm also coming up empty. Another demographic that would be nice to mention, is transmasculine people getting top surgery. We mention mastectomies but the sources are all about cancer-related ones. However, of the sources I've been able to find, all scholarly discussion of transmasculine top surgery cover-ups is either about reconstructive tattoos (which this article semi-artificially excludes in scope to avoid duplicating Medical tattoo) or is ambiguous. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 18:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
GAN?
[edit]@Dreamyshade: I'm thinking this is about ready for WP:GAN. 50 refs, including scholarly ones in multiple disciplines; good prose and flow; broad coverage; and, dare I say, very well illustrated. Do you have any outstanding concerns, or anything else you'd like to add? And would you like to be a co-nominator? It's been a pleasure working with you either way (if a bit asynchronously), and I'm happy to handle it on my own, so entirely up to you. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 19:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for asking, please go ahead! You've done great work on it. I don't have a lot of wiki-capacity right now so I won't co-nominate, but I look forward to seeing the results. Dreamyshade (talk) 01:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hilst talk 14:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- ... that some cover-up tattoos incorporate scars into the design (example pictured)? Source: Givissi, Kornilia (2016). Splits and integrations: A phenomenological exploration of self-harm marks and scars (Thesis). pp. 105–107.
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 22 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.-- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 00:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC).
- Hi Tamzin, what a GA! The hook is interesting and referenced just as well as the rest of the paragraphs. There isn't any copyvio or close paraphrasing. Image related to the topic and used in the article. 2 QPQ provided. Congratulations! --2x2leax (talk) 06:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)