Talk:Courtice

Canada: Ontario / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Population

Per WP:V, Wikipedia articles cannot include unsourced or approximated population estimates. All population figures need to be quoted directly from the most recent Statistics Canada census. If you want this article to include a population figure, then go to StatsCan's census website and extract the correct data for the individual census tract that Courtice is in. Bearcat (talk) 23:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Industry Canada community broadband profiles are not a sufficient source for population, either — they represent the population served from Courtice's broadband headend, not necessarily the population of Courtice itself. This is not a theoretical discrepancy: the IC Broadband population almost never corresponds to the census population for a given municipality. Population figures must be cited to StatsCan censuses only. Bearcat (talk) 20:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move suggestion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was to move the page, per the discussion below. SimonP (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that this article be moved to Courtice, which is currently a redirect here, per WP:CANSTYLE naming conventions. No evidence that there is another notable use for the name. DoubleBlue (talk) 18:05, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, as per the naming convention. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. "Courtice, Ontario" is a more descriptive title. --Qyd (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia titles are not intended to describe the subject; the lead is for that. DoubleBlue (talk) 21:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of disambiguation is not to convey additional information about the subject. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's more what I intended to state. Thanks. DoubleBlue (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Qyd, please stop making up your own special rules for article titling and start following Wikipedia naming conventions as written. Bearcat (talk) 06:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per CANSTYLE. Most google hits which exclude pages with "Ontario" point to articles (or linkfarms) related to this location. Mind matrix 23:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support as primary topic. Other pages involving Courtice are either persons or secondary uses. Natural Resources Canada name search also confirms this as unique name in Canada. There is no Courtice in the U.S. Census Bureau Gazetteer, nor in the UK Ordnance Survey. Dl2000 (talk) 03:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Courtice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608163652/http://geonames2.nrcan.gc.ca/cgi-bin/v9/sima_unique_v9?english%3FFATMW%3FC to http://geonames2.nrcan.gc.ca/cgi-bin/v9/sima_unique_v9?english%3FFATMW%3FC

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]