Jump to content

Talk:Courage C60

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Courage C60/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 21:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I'll give this a review; it's been waiting long enough. Wizardman 21:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wizardman: - any progress on this? :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the issues I found:

  • "The Courage C60 was a Le Mans Prototype" I'd put (LMP) next to it just so that when LMP is used later on lay readers get where the abbreviation is from.
  • "and it was in this format that the C60 had its most success" feels worded a little oddly at the end, not sure how I'd reword it though.
  • "similar to that found on open-wheel racing car at the front of the car," on an open-wheel
  • Double check comma usage in the second half of Design particularly, but throughout the article as well; there's quite a few extra commas that aren't needed.
  • "Boullion partnered Rédon to fourth place, and the fastest of the non-Audi entries." rm and
  • " previous one; by winning the 1000 km" should be comma instead of semicolon
  • Overall, the article feels on the repetitive side, since the second half is essentially just noting places in races. Not really a GA issue granted, and given the subject matter I'm not sure myself how to make it flow better without losing the encyclopedic nature. I would work on that before any attempt at FAC, though.

I'll put the article on hold and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman 23:43, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes look good, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman 01:54, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Courage C60. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]