Talk:Coupon Mountain

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Sourcing

The sourcing currently in the article does not appear to meet the criteria for what Wikipedia needs.

Sources should be reliable and independent and provide significant coverage of the subject. Those here (and others I found) were either not independent (being press releases, or otherwise directly from the company) or not providing significant coverage.

I could not find any sources which would meet the criteria, and so I have been unable to find evidence that the company meets the notability criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia.

I will give a short time for others to find suitable sources (as I said, I have looked but not found any), but then will consider taking this article to Articles for deletion.

Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL (Smarter.com began as Coupon Mountain)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL (from article, "Coupon Mountain evolved into the flagship website for MeziMedia")
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL (from article, MeziMedia was acquired by ValueClick, then the name was changed to ValueClick Brands)

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Sources

Article reviewed for independence and notability with sources included and reviewed from TechCrunch, BusinessWeek, SFGate, MarketWatch, Wall Street Journal, CNN, Today.com, Chicago Tribune, BizReport, Internetnews.com, and Web of Trust. Thank you for continued feedback.

Best, Ritika.puri (talk) 19:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict Disclosure - Just Now Learning About Policies

I am not new to Wikipedia, but I am just now wrapping my mind around the various conflict of interest policies. I do want to disclose that I work for ValueClick Brands, a subsidiary of ValueClick, Inc., which owns websites like Investopedia and CouponMountain.com. While I do realize that my affiliation could be considered a conflict of interest, I do wish to reiterate that I wholeheartedly support Wikipedia's commitment to unbiased information from a neutral point of view.

While I do wish to contribute to my companies' pages, my motivation comes from my underlying commitment to the Internet industry. ValueClick has been a major player in the sector, and we've been at the center of many debates in both a positive and negative light. I do think that even though I work for ValueClick, I am committed enough to Wikipedia to reconcile any potential conflicts of interest.

I openly encourage and welcome anyone to evaluate my contributions to the Coupon Mountain and ValueClick pages as well as any others for affiliated pages like Commission Junction and Investopedia.

I am not here to sell any products, nor am I here to write a promotional pitch. I am here to share knowledge, good and bad, about topics that I know and understand quite well. I just happen to work for a couple of them, but in no way will that affiliation ever overpower my belief in and support for the value that Wikipedia provides. For that reason, I want to take extra caution to make sure that I avoid problems resulting from perceived conflict of interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritika.puri (talk • contribs) 00:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coupon Mountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]