This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
I added some detail on the location to this page, which was
deleted with the edit summary "unsourced changes: please read WP:CITE and WP:RS on how to source your edits. thanks". So, what seems to be the problem here? I am well aware of WP:RS and WP:CITE; On the other hand, WP:NOTCITE and WP:OBV point out that if something is obvious then shouldn’t require sourcing; and a quick look at the map (here) bears out what has been posted. I also thought it was customary to post a cite request in situations like this, rather than simply deleting stuff out of hand. Swanny18 (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The claim that William Brown Street is "the only street in the United Kingdom to consist of nothing other than museums, galleries and libraries" is a quite a claim. If it is so obvious please add a citation - I have looked for one and cannot immediately see one. If I have missed an obvious source, then I apologise. Dormskirk (talk) 22:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - It would be more normal to see any details of location in the lead, and the history and architecture sections fully referenced. So, if you were add a bit to to the lead (e.g. the name of the street and adjacent buildings) that would be fine with me. Dormskirk (talk) 21:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]