Talk:County Route 97 (Rockland County, New York)

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

	New York (state) portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley.

U.S. Roads: County roads / New York

	U.S. roads portal This redirect is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Topics	U.S. county roads
Locations	New York

Merger Proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to no consensus and no action. The supporters of a merge would get more sympathy if they had done it themselves. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 16:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this article should be merged, adding elements of the "History" section into the target article. Andy 1One (talk) 01:21, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is far too much topic-specific content to merge into the "list" article. --Oakshade (talk) 04:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Far too much? The route description is basically the same as the lead, and the history can easily be merged. Look at the other routes on the main list? There are entries longer than Route 97! The AfD said keep, so I say MERGE NOW! (making a point, not yelling:) )--GroundhogTheater (talk) 07:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merger. --Rschen7754 (T C) 09:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As do I. Groundhog, you even said yourself in the AfD that this article has been around for quite a while, so why must it be merged or deleted now? –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 14:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge- The information has been either on the page or the list for months. So I was saying Andy's AfD was not premature. Don't twist my words, I don't twist yours. Not asking you to agree with me, but respect my stance. Thanks! --GroundhogTheater (talk) 20:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Definite Merge - Most of article is repeat information found on the proposed merge landing spot page. Junction list is useless and as Groundhog points out, route description info resembles information in top section. Author claimed to have extra history, well now would be the time to post that.--BurpTheBaby (Talk) 23:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat comment - Again, lets give Mitchazenia time to build the page. The AfD failed because the closing admin granted time to Mitch to get it done. So there should be no rush to merge! --Airtuna08 (talk) 08:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.