Jump to content

Talk:County Route 107 (Orange County, New York)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:County Route 107 (Orange County, New York)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 20:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • You probably don't need the legend in the Major intersections section, since there aren't any of these colors represented to need describing.
    • The last sentence of the history section seems incomplete. I think something is missing...
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

A couple issues with prose, but otherwise good, so I'm putting the article on hold. Another nicely written article about a minuscule section of road :) Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The legend is in a template - can't remove that. The other problem is solved.Mitch32(UP) 20:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see. Oh well, whatever. Anyway, everything else looks good, so I'm passing the article. Again, nice work. Dana boomer (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USRD GA audit

[edit]

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]