Talk:Cornwall 2000

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Still going?

This group does not seem to have any presence outside of Wiki.Serpren (talk) 05:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cornwall 2000 and the European Court of Human Rights

Added the following - In August 2008 it was announced by Cornwall 2000 that they propose to lodge a case for the proposed inclusion of the Cornish into the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities with the European Court of Human Rights. For a case to reach this stage however, it must be shown that Cornish campaigners and Cornwall 2000 have exhausted all domestic legal avenues by having the case summarily dismissed by the High Court, the Appeal Court and the House of Lords. Cornwall 2000 claim however that, before such a challenge can begin, they need to raise at least £100,000 to cover potential adverse costs.Saroum (talk) 14:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As this fight failed to reach the sum needed to proceed, and therefore never really got off the ground, shouldn't the article be changed to reflect this?Serpren (talk) 02:48, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If John Angarrack is to be considered a "leading historian", where are the references to published papers, research, or academic qualifications? His Wiki page dscribes him as ; "John Angarrack is a Cornish campaigner , human rights activist and writer on Cornish affairs." Surely "amateur historian who has self published three books", would be more accurate? Serpren (talk) 02:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]