Talk:Corning Museum of Glass

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Craft High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Craft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of craft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CraftWikipedia:WikiProject CraftTemplate:WikiProject CraftCraft articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Corning Museum of Glass Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Corning Museum of Glass GLAM Project objectives. If you would like to contribute to articles related to the art, history, science, and technology of glass, please join the discussion.Corning Museum of GlassWikipedia:GLAM/Corning Museum of GlassTemplate:WikiProject Corning Museum of GlassCorning Museum of Glass-related articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggested update to Growth and Renovations section

Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented.

Hi - I would like to suggest a change to the Growth and Renovations section of the Corning Museum of Glass article. The last sentence in the section currently states "The North Wing expansion is slated to open in 2014." The wing is now called the Contemporary Art + Design Wing, and it will open March 20, 2015. (see this UrbanGlass article and this page on the CMoG website). I work at the Corning Museum of Glass and would like to avoid a conflict of interest. Would someone else be able to approve the change and/or update the sentence? Thanks in advance! extabulis (talk) 20:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Additional independent sources include this Star-Gazette article and this article from The Art Newspaper. extabulis (talk) 20:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the expected completion date, but didn't add the long winded wing-name. CorporateM (Talk) 01:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, CorporateM! Instead of adding the full name, would you mind changing "North Wing expansion" to "new wing" or "new contemporary wing"? Both of those are more accurate than North Wing. extabulis (talk) 18:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done I'm fine with that. CorporateM (Talk) 18:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! extabulis (talk) 19:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Notes" section

Hi

What on earth is this section? It is not notes from the body of text, as there is nothing to link them.

Is this really just external links, or some weird section for adverstising? Chaosdruid (talk) 12:01, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chaosdruid, looks to me like this was part of an edit from a user with a close connection to the topic. At least some of the sources also appear in the references section. I'd vote to incorporate any sources that are useful as references, then delete this section. extabulis (talk) 14:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

extabulis, well I've made a start - turned some of them into external links, removed dead ones, converted the first to match the external links format, amalgamated them into the section and removed the "Notes" section.

I have to go for now, will try and remember to get back to this at the weekend ... Chaosdruid (talk) 17:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing style and tone - removal of info

Hi. I'm a new editor and am wondering if it is cool to just remove the sections/info that state the names of different galleries? It seems like that section is only designed to give props to donors, rather than tell you much about the museum itself. How frowned upon is deletion within an article? Bustlingporkchop (talk) 04:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]