Talk:Corning, California

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled

There are also gangs in Corning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.81.178.126 (talk) 01:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unspotted vandalism??

Can this edit be verified? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.100.121.217 (talk) 21:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Population Variance?

I'm just wondering why there is such a large population variance, for the City of Corning, between the figure reported in the last Census...and the figure showing in the right hand margin overview. In examining the growth between the 2000 and 2010 Census, the population reported in the overview--which would be the growth between 2010 and 2013/14--doesn't make sense to me. (You can find the population reported in the last Census in the first paragraph on Corning.)

If the figure in the overview is correct, does anyone know the reason why the population more than doubled over the course of a three to four year period? Thanks...

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Corning, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]