Talk:Cordell & Cordell

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cordell & Cordell article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 19 July 2013 by reviewer Sionk (talk · contribs).

Missouri

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article at AfC

Article at AfC seems to have been declined by an inexperienced reviewer as part of the current Backlog Drive. I can't see any major reasons why it can't be accepted. The firm has been profiled in several reputable national news sources. Sionk (talk) 13:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page Edits

Hey ScionK, I just had a few questions about some of the edits that were denied on the last round of updates. Mainly, I am curious if there is no way to list some the divorce resource websites Cordell & Cordell manages. I take it the way I tried to do it was against the rules, and was curious if you had any suggestions that were within the bounds of Wikipedia's guidelines.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattallen1979 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cordell & Cordell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cordellcordell.com/contact.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needs critics page

They needs a critics section 2600:1700:7D48:DD00:9DEB:5E05:1153:5871 (talk) 00:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

undoubtedly...the person editing this immediately changes anything you create. I'd like to understand if they have a financial relationship with Cordell & Cordell. This page should be informative and objective, not marketing. 2601:540:C702:DB40:C4E3:1B52:C93F:56CC (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopedia, a section of reddit reviews is not appropriate. If you can find encyclopedic discussion of them from legitimate, independent, reliable sources, then it might be added (as long as it is neutral). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising or marketing platform. - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]