This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Photo request: Just about all of them! Any pictures of wine regions, grape varieties or wine would be useful. In particular we need wine region maps that can be licensed for Wikipedia.
In January I blocked an editor (Rowman) who was clearly here only to spam for this article. I also have no doubt that it was created by an editor (Jmb519) who was clearly here only to plant this article. The article was nominated for deletion by DGG who withdrew the nomination after solid sleuthing by Yngvadottir. Personally, I think the article is still on the thin side of notability, but that's beside the point. The point of this note is really to say that given the efforts of three experienced editors (five, really, counting SamHolt6 and Mean as custard) the article is in decent shape, and I think it is safe to remove the disfiguring tag. Really, the tag serves as a warning that the content might not be neutral--which sort of denies the work done by these five editors. I am leaving this note here then to serve as a notification that such a problem did indeed exist in the past, but the article in its current shape is unproblematic enough to not be tagged like this. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 15:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies: I agree with the removal of the UDP tag. As stated above, I made a major cut [1] to the article before, and since then the article has been gradually built back up under the watchful eye of several established editors. It is clear from the number of SPA's that have edited this article that some off-wiki entity is attempting to make content changes, but as these changes have been consistently trimmed down I have no objection to removing the UDP tag. We should keep an eye on the article, however.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:54, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
