Talk:CopyBot

I just wanted to pre-emptively state that although I did not actually write any code involved in this program, I am part of the "libsecondlife project" which created most of the technology used to create "CopyBot".

This is currently an emotionally-charged issue, with a lot of technical subtlety -- as the article stands, it contains many factual inaccuracies, which I'm going to try to correct without influencing NPOV one way or the other. If you disagree with any of the edits I made, please bring it here to the talk page so that we can come to some agreement. Bushing 17:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you're involved in the project, please use third-party sources to verify the content you're adding or changing. That will avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest. | Mr. Darcy talk 17:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although people may have accused me of being a member of the team due to my opinions on the subject, I can safely say I am not a member of the libsecondlife development team, nor have I even touched anything remotely resmbilng a .Net IDE in nearly a year. Although I am a member of Second Life, and the founder of the Wikipedians group :-D

I do believe I have satisfied the requirements of third-party sources :-)

Signpostmarv 07:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May help to be linked to something explaining, or at least displaying, the copybot, in the external links? Right now very little real information can be gleaned? 76.179.150.59 20:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you mean like a screenshot of the program running? that might be hard to get considering the increased difficulty in obtaining a copy of the program... Also, does it have a gui or does it run just on console? I don't think that a picture of an avatar that is connected using the program would be very helpfull, perhaps if someone managed to capture the copying process mid-way showing the original and the copdied avatar side by side (of course, copying only material that can be copied without worrying about breakign any rules) that would be a better "in-world" picture of the CopyBot, dunno. --TiagoTiago (talk) 08:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The edit by 72.208.241.173 is unsourced, appears heavily biased, and untrue as far as I have been able to determine. --Bannable (talk) 07:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on CopyBot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]