Jump to content

Talk:Copper(I) oxide

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

prsparation/use? pigment usage?

[edit]

This "red plague" sounds like, and has possibly been used as, a painter's pigment, apparently stable when encapsulated in oil, and possibly even water/protein egg "glairs". alas production is currently missing as is any history (I haven't found one either) of an artists' pigment.74.108.139.186 (talk) 20:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semiconductor properties

[edit]

The history of semiconductor research and applications is strongly connected with this material. First semiconductor diode, first Wannier exciton series observation. Today it is of interest because of narrow exciton resonances and long exciton lifetimes, particularly in connection with BEC. Some people also try to build photovoltaic cells from Cu2O. These things need more emphasis. Jcb.h6t (talk) 17:06, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the statement about Bose-Einstein condensation, simply because it is wrong. All claims have been refuted. Jcb.h6t (talk) 17:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the developments that you mention are so very important, then you might consider replacing the primary journal refs with citations to reviews and books. Primary journal citations are less sought in Wikipedia and are less valuable to readers who seek more perspective. WP:Secondary.--Smokefoot (talk) 18:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I replaced some of the references. I will check wether there is a recent review about excitons in Cu2O to replace the others. If not, I delete those parts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcb.h6t (talkcontribs) 09:29, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Copper(I) oxide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"🜣" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 🜣 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#🜣 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:17, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"🜤" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 🜤 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 11#🜤 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]