Jump to content

Talk:Cooper, Texas/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 17:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    No issues with prose.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Everything that needs a source is properly sourced.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Every aspect is covered. I used to have a cousin who lived in Cooper, so a lot of the reading here was fascinating.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    I added a shot of some businesses on the town square, as I felt the article needed an image on the town itself.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Great job on the article.