Talk:Controlled-environment agriculture

Untitled

I think looking at this, it'd be good to do some distancing from that page wordwise. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: I agree it wasn't you that added it...but it's sitting there and we've found it. I have asked folks to just massage/distance the prose when found. I will try and cement this into rules next time but thought it was a given that text too close needed to be changed whereever it occurs on WP. One is a quote so that is ok. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have altered the paragraph in question. One of earwig's results showed that one website was infringing another one's copyright and our article matched both! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indoor agriculture article needed.

Not all CEA is "indoor agriculture" (IA). Therefore, a separate article on that sub-topic is probably appropriate -- as well as a separate section in this article. Vertical farming, while also a separate article, needs a section here, as well. ~ Penlite (talk) 06:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technical section needs more info.

The "Technical" section needs fleshing out. It appears to be little more than an outline for a section -- not an encyclopedic article.

"Justifies" not justified.

In the "Industry" section, under "Economics", some previous editor wrote:

"The production potential of these farm networks justifies the investment in infrastructural value and contributes towards the 2030 SDGS to combat carbon footprint.[5]"

"Justifies" is an opinion of value, not a statement of indisputable encyclopedic fact. As with all moral pontificating, and value "judgement calls", it is not an appropriate term in Wikipedia articles. This is just one of several instances where it appears that this article was written by a promoter of CEA, rather than just a WP:NPOV objective editor. ~ Penlite (talk) 20:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]