This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Texas State University/Introduction to nonprofit and voluntary sector theory (fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
I would like to contribute to the page regarding Contract Failure as part of a class project for Texas State University. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
The information currently presented on the page provides a short overview of contract failure. I plan to expand upon this overview in order to provide a broader understanding of the term. I intend to contribute the following sections of information such as information asymmetry, nonprofit existence, and non-distribution constraint. These sections are key concepts helpful to understand contract failure. Emz4415 (talk) 23:35, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that citation 6, talking about Caroline Kiely, specifically the sentence "Caroline Kiely is a woman, and an example of this concept." is a bad citation. I cannot find this name in the linked document at all. I think this sentence should be deleted because it does not contribute to the article in any meaningful way. 205.234.117.162 (talk) 03:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)ShadowJedi[reply]
